How to Drive User Adoption for PLM-ERP Integration in Manufacturing
Eric Van Hofwegen
Table of contents
PLM ERP integration in manufacturing holds immense promise but also tremendous risk.
As manufacturers work to unify product lifecycle management (PLM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, they often face a harsh reality: integration efforts frequently fall short of expectations.
McKinsey says that 70% of technology projects fail due to not knowing the impact of the transformation. This failure rate is rarely due to technology limitations. Instead, it's overwhelmingly tied to one critical factor: poor user adoption.
Integrating PLM and ERP systems is not just a technical exercise but a sweeping organizational shift impacting engineering, production, quality, procurement, and beyond.
Without effective user adoption strategies, even the most advanced integration can stall on the shop floor or be ignored in the design office.
This guide explores the key to PLM ERP integration in manufacturing: user adoption.
We'll break down actionable strategies for ensuring your integration succeeds, not just from a technical perspective, but in a way that transforms how your manufacturing teams operate every day.
|
Are you looking to simplify your PLM-ERP integration journey? Get in touch with us today. |
The Critical Role of PLM ERP Integration in Manufacturing
What is PLM ERP Integration?
PLM ERP integration manufacturing refers to the seamless linking of PLM (responsible for engineering design, revisions, and part definitions) with ERP (used for financials, production, and supply chain).
In modern manufacturing, this integration ensures that products, bills of materials (BOMs), engineering changes, and version controls flow automatically from PLM into ERP.
The connection results in a single source of truth that eliminates silos, reduces manual workload, and unifies cross-functional collaboration.
The Business Impact of PLM ERP Integration
A well-executed PLM ERP integration can significantly boost operational efficiency.
By automating data transfer and eliminating duplicate entries, manufacturers can accelerate time to market, reduce production errors, and optimize inventory.
Additionally, the integration provides real-time visibility across engineering and production, fostering data integrity, and enables cross-functional teams to align on product changes and schedules.
Explore the full benefits of PLM ERP integration here: PLM-ERP Integration for Dynamics 365: The Top 12 Benefits We Offer
ROI Potential of PLM ERP Integration
The ROI potential for integrating PLM and ERP is substantial.
For instance, in one 5‑year ROI model, a mid‑sized $200M revenue manufacturer can expect cumulative gross margin gains of $8M and significant cost savings driven by automated processes and fewer errors.
With improved cross-functional collaboration, faster product launches, and enhanced data quality, organizations often see integration payback costs within the first 1 to 2 years.
By embedding PLM ERP integration in manufacturing, companies transform disconnected systems into synchronized engines, capturing measurable ROI while laying the groundwork for sustainable digital transformation.
Dive deeper into calculating the ROI of PLM ERP integration here: What is the ROI of our PLM-ERP Integration for Dynamics 365?
Why User Adoption Determines PLM ERP Integration Success in Manufacturing
Successful PLM ERP integration does not end with merely connecting systems. You must ensure that the end-users (your teams) can benefit from and consistently use it.
At its core, PLM ERP integration success hinges on manufacturing user adoption. When team members embrace new processes and tools, they transform integration from a technical achievement into a business enabler.
Our experience with manufacturing companies consistently shows that poor user engagement during implementation leads to fragmented workflows, increased errors, and stalled ROI.
A McKinsey report reinforces this, noting that some of the leading causes of delays in digital transformation projects are misaligned culture, lack of clarity, and insufficient alignment.
Without engagement from engineering, production, QA, and supply chain teams, even the most technically sound implementation can fail to deliver expected benefits.
Manufacturing-Specific Adoption Challenges
Manufacturing environments introduce adoption barriers that go beyond technical hurdles:
-
Resistance to change on the shop floor: Operators and engineers often fear system changes disrupting tightly scheduled production and some engineers may resist under the impression that they will be required to work directly in ERP instead of their familiar tools.
-
Data ownership uncertainty: Responsibilities shift after the integration. For instance, engineers become responsible for ERP data integrity, which could confuse users.
-
Shift-based environments: Rollouts must consider diverse shifts, multiple teams, and 24/7 operations, which complicate training and support.
-
Cross-functional impact: Integration touches finance, procurement, quality, and external partners. A lack of awareness across functions can disrupt coordination.

These issues aren't just theoretical; they directly affect productivity, quality, and cycle times. Without well-designed manufacturing user adoption strategies, resistance and misalignment can erode expected gains from integration.
Impact on ROI and Integration Outcomes
There's a clear correlation between user adoption and ROI. For example, organizations that involve key users early, invest in tailored training, and communicate new workflows will achieve a quicker and higher ROI.
Conversely, when adoption is neglected, integration becomes a system that exists "in theory," not practice, leading to underutilized features, hidden silos, and missed savings.
In manufacturing, implementation isn't complete until teams across engineering, production, QA, and supply chain adopt it as their default system.
By prioritizing user adoption strategies, you can ensure that PLM ERP integration delivers a lasting impact, transforming end-to-end operations.
A Complete User Adoption Framework for PLM ERP Integration in Manufacturing
An effective PLM ERP integration in manufacturing requires more than a technology deployment. It demands a structured approach to engage, prepare, and support users across the organization.
This user adoption framework outlines seven key phases that manufacturing organizations should follow to maximize integration success.
Each phase focuses on aligning people, processes, and platforms to ensure lasting value from the implementation.

Phase 1: Pre-Integration User Readiness Assessment
Before the implementation process begins, manufacturing leaders must evaluate team capabilities and organizational preparedness. A thorough team assessment helps identify skill gaps, resource constraints, and current system usage patterns. This ensures that all functional areas, especially engineering, production, and quality, are ready for system changes and workflow alignment.
It is equally essential to identify integration champions within key departments. These advocates can support PLM ERP integration readiness by providing early feedback, leading training efforts, and reinforcing adoption from within. Without a clear understanding of readiness, integration efforts risk friction and resistance later in the rollout.
Here are some questions to ask your engineers and manufacturers before PLM-ERP integration.
Phase 2: Manufacturing Stakeholder Engagement Strategy
Active manufacturing stakeholder engagement is essential for building momentum and securing buy-in. Actively soliciting their inputs further strengthens commitment as engineering, production, quality control, and supply chain professionals interact with PLM and ERP systems differently, so engagement must be tailored to each group's priorities.
Clear and ongoing communication about PLM ERP integration is vital. Manufacturing teams must understand the integration's purpose, how it benefits their day-to-day work, and what support they'll receive including avenues to provide feedback and shape the rollout.
Focusing on key benefits for end-users, such as faster product updates, fewer manual errors, and better data accuracy, can drive engagement across the organization.
Phase 3: Role-Based Training for Manufacturing Teams
PLM ERP integration training should not be one-size-fits-all. The end-user training must be adapted to real-world manufacturing roles.
Engineers need tools for managing BOM changes and CAD integration, while production workers need quick access to real-time data and simplified user interfaces.
Effective manufacturing team development involves hands-on workshops, interactive simulations, and learning resources. Trainings should be scheduled to align with shift patterns and address job-specific use cases, ensuring all users are confident and capable in the new environment.
Phase 4: Phased PLM ERP Integration Rollout
Large-scale integration in manufacturing environments is best executed in phases. Start with pilot groups (often within engineering or a specific production line) to validate processes before broader deployment.
A phased rollout helps reduce risk, build confidence, and refine the PLM ERP integration implementation approach.
Incorporating structured feedback loops into your manufacturing rollout strategy is equally critical. Collect user input regularly and use it to iterate on workflows, user interfaces, and support documentation. This responsive approach improves technical configuration and user experience as the rollout expands.
Phase 5: Change Management for Manufacturing Environments
Change management in manufacturing should focus on updating processes and shifting mindsets.
PLM ERP integration change management must address fear of job disruption, learning curve concerns, and the perception that new systems slow production.
Leaders should reinforce the integration’s long-term value to achieve lasting manufacturing culture transformation while identifying short-term challenges. This includes empowering supervisors as change agents, celebrating early wins, and recognizing milestones.
Related reading: Best Practices to Prepare for PLM ERP Integration
Phase 6: Integration Performance Monitoring
Post-implementation, manufacturers must track performance to ensure that systems deliver measurable impact. To quantify success, use PLM ERP integration metrics such as data quality, workflow cycle time, and time-to-resolution on engineering change orders (ECOs).
Manufacturing performance monitoring should include dashboards and alerts that provide visibility across roles. Regular reviews of adoption KPIs enable continuous improvement, help identify areas of improvement, and drive accountability for the entire organization.
Phase 7: Long-term PLM ERP Adoption Sustainability
True integration success happens over months and years, not weeks. PLM ERP integration sustainability depends on knowledge retention, onboarding processes for new employees, and accessible training resources that evolve with the system.
Long-term manufacturing system optimization includes periodic refresher training, superuser networks, and regular system health checks.
Sustaining adoption also means aligning integration improvements with business growth, implementing necessary system updates, and scaling capabilities as product lines, teams, and markets expand.
Role-Specific PLM ERP Integration Strategies for Manufacturing
A successful manufacturing PLM ERP integration strategy must consider the specific needs of each functional area.
Different teams interact with data, systems, and workflows in unique ways. Here are a few role-specific integration strategies across core manufacturing functions.
Engineering Teams
Engineering teams benefit from PLM ERP integration through seamless design data transfer, inventory levels, unit prices, open production orders, and more controlled change management.
With consolidated data and real-time visibility, engineers can make timely decisions on allocations, order commitments thus minimizing delays and accelerating development cycles.
Adoption efforts should focus on training engineers to manage BOM structures, initiate engineering change orders (ECOs), and understand how their updates affect downstream operations.
Hands-on sessions that explain PLM-to-ERP data flow help engineers see the value of using the integrated system correctly.
Production Teams
Shop floor teams benefit from real-time access to latest work instructions, part lists, and change notifications—all delivered directly from the integrated PLM-ERP environment. This reduces errors and supports faster, more consistent production execution.
Training for production workers should prioritize system navigation, version control awareness, product data management, and digital work order usage.
Adoption strategies should include shift-based training, visual aids, and ongoing floor support to reinforce daily usage of the integrated tools.

Supply Chain and Procurement Teams
Procurement and supply chain teams use integration to manage sourcing decisions, vendor communications, and cost data based on up-to-date engineering inputs. BOM changes are instantly reflected in purchasing, reducing mismatches and delays.
These users must be trained on BOM consumption, supplier collaboration tools, and change impact assessments.
Adoption should also include clear workflows for handling engineering-driven sourcing updates and managing procurement notifications tied to product changes.
Quality Assurance Teams
PLM ERP integration enables QA teams to connect inspection data and nonconformance reports to product definitions and revisions. This instant connection improves traceability and corrective action tracking.
User adoption should focus on training QA personnel to link quality records to product versions, interpret integrated change logs, and manage closed-loop corrective actions in the system.
Case-based workshops and real-data simulations can help QA teams understand how to navigate the system efficiently and spot quality trends early.

Common PLM ERP Integration Pitfalls in Manufacturing
- Pitfall: Disconnected BOMs and Part Records
Poor alignment between PLM and ERP leads to data inconsistencies, duplicate parts, and version errors. This breaks workflows between engineering and production.
Prevention Strategy: Create a unified data model with standardized BOM and part structures validated by both engineering and production teams.
- Pitfall: No User Involvement in Early Stages
If system workflows are built without input from the people who actually use them, it results in low adoption. In such scenarios, teams often revert to manual workarounds.
Prevention Strategy: Involve end users early through pilot testing and workshops to ensure system alignment with day-to-day processes.
- Pitfall: Launching Integration During Peak Production
Rolling out new systems during high-volume periods increases disruption risk and frustrates shop floor teams.
Prevention Strategy: Schedule phased rollouts during off-peak periods and coordinate with production leaders to minimize the impact.
- Pitfall: Workflow Misalignment Between Systems
Disconnected change control and approval flows create confusion and delays between departments.
Prevention Strategy: Map and align end-to-end workflows across PLM and ERP to ensure clear roles and synchronized processes.
- Pitfall: Underestimating Training Needs
Generic or rushed training leaves users confused and reliant on workarounds. Post go-live users could still not know how the integration works which hinders productivity.
Prevention Strategy: Deliver targeted, role-specific training using real use cases, job aids, and hands-on sessions.
- Pitfall: No Metrics for Early Integration Success
Without clear KPIs, it’s difficult to detect adoption issues or system problems early.
Prevention Strategy: Define and monitor key metrics that matter for your business. KPIs like usage rates, data sync accuracy, and support requests can be helpful to track success.
- Pitfall: Full System Go-Live Without Testing
Skipping pilots increases the chance of untested errors affecting production environments.
Prevention Strategy: Begin with a controlled pilot deployment, gather feedback, and refine before full rollout.
Related reading: Mistakes to avoid when integrating PLM and ERP systems
Conclusion
Successfully integrating PLM and ERP systems in manufacturing isn’t just about connecting software but empowering people.
As this guide shows, user adoption is one of the most critical factors in realizing the full value of PLM ERP integration. Without engaged users, even the most advanced systems fail to deliver results.
By applying structured, role-specific adoption strategies, manufacturing organizations can avoid costly disruptions, accelerate implementation, and unlock measurable ROI.
Strong adoption leads to better data accuracy, streamlined collaboration, and faster decision-making across the product lifecycle.
At STAEDEAN, we understand the challenges manufacturers face when connecting PLM and ERP systems, especially when user adoption is overlooked.
Our PLM/ PDM/ CAD integration solution for Microsoft Dynamics 365 is built with functionality and usability in mind.
Key benefits of our PLM ERP integration solution:
- User-friendly, no-code setup
- Real-time, bidirectional data exchange
- Built-in support for manufacturing-specific workflows
- Fast, low-disruption implementation
- Compatible with any PLM/PDM/CAD system
- Designed to support long-term user adoption